Why UserLock? Compare UserLock alternatives

UserLock is an access management and multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution created by IS Decisions. It offers IT teams enhanced protection, control, and visibility over user access in Windows Active Directory and cloud environments.

UserLock provides a solution for key zero-trust concerns such as unauthorized access and data breaches. Easy to install, it integrates seamlessly with on-premises and hybrid Active Directory environments, extending security capabilities without replacing existing user account policies.

A quick look at UserLock’s main functionalities shows why it’s a popular solution:

• Robust security using multiple MFA methods
• Optional single sign-on (SSO)
• Granular MFA and contextual access management to streamline security
• Strong monitoring, alerts, and response for system admins
• Reporting and auditing to safeguard user accounts
• Meets several compliance requirements

If you’re currently in the market for an MFA solution, you know how challenging it can be to sift through the many options. Of course, the best MFA/two-factor authentication (2FA) solution will depend on the security needs of your unique environment. Here, we explore the features, benefits, and limitations of UserLock alternatives.

UserLock alternatives at a glance

 

 

Okta

Okta is an identity and access management (IAM) solution that operates in the cloud. It offers secure and user-friendly authentication and is available with MFA and SSO add-on solutions.

Pros

• With a variety of verification methods available, Okta MFA can be configured at either the application or organizational level
• Okta has integrations with numerous cloud and SaaS application providers
• Contextual access management enables administrators to simplify MFA procedures
• The Okta Admin Console provides comprehensive monitoring and auditing features

Cons

• To work with on-premise and legacy applications, Okta’s cloud-based service must synchronize via additional software
• Administrators cannot establish designated login hours for their users, nor can they restrict them
• Users frequently report a delay between accepting a push notification and successfully logging in

UserLock vs Okta

While Okta provides MFA solutions for Windows and remote desktop connections (RDP), it is not their primary focus. By partnering with UserLock, organizations can achieve on-premise MFA without connecting to a cloud IP provider. UserLock’s integration with Active Directory simplifies the setup process for on-premise MFA, making it more efficient to manage.

 

Duo Security

Duo is used by both individuals and organizations to provide employee and customer access security. This software provides secure access control and MFA utilizing various methods, including push notifications, biometrics, tokens, and passcodes.

Pros

• Duo is a flexible solution that can be used for a huge variety of tasks
• Duo is used by many organizations for its functionality, integrations, and flexible pricing
• Many SaaS and cloud platforms use Duo’s mobile app to provide access

Cons

• Customers have noted slow response times from the support service
• End-users who are less technically proficient may find the configuration process challenging
• Users have reported instances of MFA timing out
• Users experience delays with push notifications, which are also subject to a 30-second expiry

UserLock vs Duo

While both provide secure access controls, UserLock offers a smoother on-premise MFA setup process for existing Active Directory environments. Duo has a broader range of verification methods and is widely used with many existing SaaS and cloud platforms. Existing clients have mentioned that UserLock’s solution provides cost-effective security for their existing Active Directory compared to Duo.

Microsoft Azure Active Directory (Azure AD)

Azure AD is a cloud-based service from Microsoft that offers IAM solutions for cloud and hybrid applications, including Microsoft Office 365, Azure, and various other Microsoft products. It lets administrators manage user identities and access rights across various applications and services, with optional features like MFA.

Pros

• Azure AD features adaptive policies for conditional access control
• Admins get real-time visibility into user context, device, and location
• Optional SSO functionality
• Native integration with many Microsoft products allows for easy user provisioning and management

Cons

• Expensive compared to other MFA solutions
• New users can find the depth of features and options overwhelming
• Integrations with non-Microsoft products can be tricky

UserLock vs Microsoft Azure Active Directory

While Azure AD features excellent integrations with other Microsoft and cloud-based products, UserLock excels in working with on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments. Azure AD could be a good choice if you’re already using Microsoft products, are moving to the cloud, and aren’t concerned about budget.

Thales Safenet Trusted Access

Thales is a cloud-based authentication solution that offers SSO and MFA capabilities, with monitoring and reporting tools for enhanced control and visibility. It integrates with popular SaaS applications and can be rapidly deployed to secure user access to cloud-based applications.

Pros

• Cloud-based authentication platform that enhances security for online identities and cloud accounts
• A broad range of authentication methods are available
• Context-based authentication streamlines user logins
• The Thales policy engine provides administrators with customization opportunities

Cons

• Thales requires additional software to work with on-premise and hybrid Active Directory
• SafeNet Trusted Access SSO is a different product, making deployment challenging
• At present, Thales does not provide administrators with the ability to restrict concurrent user logins, which could cause regulation concerns

UserLock vs Thales Safenet Trusted Access

While Thales STA provides essential protections, its one-size-fits-all approach may not suit all environments. UserLock offers strong granular MFA and contextual access controls that let you tailor security to your environment’s needs.

Auth0

Auth0, from Okta, improves identity management by providing secure access to cloud-based applications. The Auth0 Identity Platform offers customization options, enabling admins to tweak many settings.

Pros

• Lots of features mean there are endless options for customization
• The toolset is geared toward DevOps environments to protect new platforms
• Third-party identity extensions can be easily integrated into the product

Cons

• Some reviews say the platform could be more user-friendly
• On-premises environments require additional software for compatibility
• Other options may be better suited to organizations looking for simple implementation of MFA

UserLock vs Auth0

UserLock is an on-premise solution that provides improved control and visibility over user access in both Active Directory and cloud environments. Auth0 is a cloud-based service that allows organizations to grant secure access to any user for any application. Its primary focus is arguably on building customized access controls for developers instead of existing on-premise systems.

Rublon

Rublon is an MFA solution that provides enhanced security for user logins through a combination of authentication factors. Its methods include passwords, biometric data, and hardware tokens, giving admins options for defending system vulnerabilities.

Pros

• Rublon integrates with many cloud-based and SaaS platforms
• Many different authentication options are available
• User-friendly functionality, with self-service capabilities
• Well-received customer support services

Cons

• A more thorough online knowledge base would help with early troubleshooting
• Some MFA methods may have a time lag between the user’s access request and receiving a code
• MFA lacks detailed controls for granular management

UserLock vs Rublon

Rublon’s versatility lies in integrating with many different cloud-based systems and applications. It’s a good UserLock alternative for organizations looking for a cloud-based solution. If your environment is based on-premise, UserLock’s customization and integrations may provide a better choice.

ManageEngine ADSelfServicePlus

ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus is an identity security solution that primarily serves as a password management system. It provides IT teams with additional features like MFA. ManageEngine also gives users self-service password change capabilities.

Pros

• ADSelfService Plus saves helpdesks time by empowering users with some everyday security tasks, like password resets
• MFA can be rolled out for cloud applications
• The platform offers several add-on features, such as additional MFA methods and SSO capabilities, to extend security further
• ADSelfService Plus has multiple editions available, letting organizations choose the best fit for their systems

Cons

• The pricing model for ManageEngine may be confusing and too expensive for smaller organizations
• Some key features are only offered in premium versions
• Integrating with existing on-premise or hybrid systems can be a manual and time-consuming process
• Customization options for on-premise or hybrid users are limited, with a lack of per-user granular control

UserLock vs ManageEngine ADSelfServicePlus

ManageEngine offers several network security solutions. The ManageEngine ecosystem might be a good choice for organizations looking to implement several different products to address several different use cases. For others, the simplicity and comprehensive solution UserLock offers might be a better fit.

Authy

Twilio Authy is a cloud-based MFA solution and mobile app. It enhances the security of user and customer logins through methods such as one-time passwords or biometric factors. Authy is user-friendly and integrates easily with different systems and applications.

Pros

• Authy lets users synchronize their 2FA across multiple devices
• Features such as TouchID and encrypted backups enhance security
• Authy generates a single-use token on the user’s cell phone, making the login experience simple

Cons

• Limited options for MFA methods compared with other solutions
• Lack of customization and granular controls
• May not be suitable for the more complex needs of medium, large, or regulated organizations

UserLock vs Authy

Authy is an excellent app for implementing a second authentication factor for user logins. The key to Authy’s success is its simplicity and easy integrations with cloud platforms. For IT teams requiring deeper control, more MFA methods, and on-premise integration, a solution like UserLock will be a better fit.

IBM Security Verify

IBM Security Verify is a widely used IAM solution for both workforces and consumers. The platform provides several MFA methods for verifying users on VPN connections, web applications, and other endpoints.

Pros

• Seamless integration with other IBM products to protect cloud-based identities
• Adaptive access functionality enables administrators to fine-tune MFA permissions and settings
• IBM Security Verify offers a variety of MFA methods, including its own iOS and Android mobile app
• Administrators can define high-risk incidents and configure alerts, improving data security

Cons

• Complex documentation makes it difficult for users to troubleshoot common issues
• The solution can be challenging to deploy, especially in on-premise environments
• Reporting capabilities are limited without integrating a third-party solution
• Admin-level users have reported a lack of strong session management and API access controls

UserLock vs IBM Security Verify

Organizations already within the IBM ecosystem will find Security Verify an excellent choice. While it is a comprehensive UserLock alternative for securing cloud apps, protecting on-premise Active Directory connections requires redirecting authentication to a cloud service, unlike with UserLock.

Why UserLock?

UserLock integrates seamlessly with Active Directory environments, providing secure on-premise and remote access authentication. It can also be combined with SSO for access to SaaS applications without sending user authentication to the cloud. Overall, UserLock’s cost-effective pricing, granular controls, and range of MFA methods make it a popular choice to defend against cyber threats.

Start a free trial of UserLock today